Casson: "Berlusconi wants to maintain a high level of confrontation" Vice President of the Democratic Party in the Senate defines Berlusocni explicit words "out of order and out of every common sense." It gives her a key to reading this latest joke Berlusconi: "Berlusconi is interested in maintaining a high level of confrontation is to protect itself and to keep open the option of early termination of the rooms." Casson is not surprised by the silence Schifani, "after all - tells the others online - is the President of the Senate some time ago had suggested the idea of \u200b\u200bearly voting." But looming on the horizon on which solution meets dry, "I can not see because it lacks the political will of a party."
Berlusconi Congress EPP spoke of Italy as a country where sovereignty has passed into the hands of the judiciary. We are still at this point?
I think that out so well the words of the Prime Minister is also beyond any common sense. Berlusconi is interested in maintaining a high level of confrontation is to protect himself, in view of ongoing processes, both to keep open all hypotheses including that of the political dissolution of Parliament. Use this form as an element of pressure on its parliamentary groups with this law that God made wicked are appointed.
The President of the Republic, Giorgio Napolitano spoke of a "violent act against institutions and the Speaker of the House called for a clarification. But as you exit from this situation?
I think it's difficult to get out. Also because the President of the Council there is no political will. The tones can be justified only so high with what we just said. If one of the parties does not want to tone down hard to find a solution. Well they did the upper echelons of the State to respond and ask for an explanation.
But the President of the Senate, Renato Schifani not made itself felt. Why?
I'm not surprised at all that Schifani failed to act. Schifani was just some time ago to envisage the possibility of early dissolution of whether the situation had continued in Thus, de facto replacing Berlusconi.
stress as it comes out? It might be useful or even bicameral Constituent Assembly?
Look, I will not hide behind a finger and the work done by our group is there to witness it. We think that we need institutional reform, by reducing the number of parliamentary federalism, and restore the balance of powers. How we think it is also necessary to improve the functioning of the machinery of justice. But for institutional reform is a shared political will to reform the justice serves to focus the interest of the citizens first.
And the Bicameral?
Again, the instruments can be different, but first of all you need is the political will and that seems to be no part of the center. Above all, the reforms do not seem to want Berlusconi first of all.