Someone remember the period before the second Gulf War (or War of Iraq)? It was a continuous succession of reports on Saddam Hussein: the terrible dictator who supported terrorists, had weapons of mass destruction and threatened the entire world.
Then, fortunately, the Americans invaded Iraq, unfortunately have not found weapons of mass destruction of Saddam, but it does not matter because those who have the weapons taken directly using them to destroy their towns and villages, killing thousands of people through This managed to depose the cruel tyrant and bring peace and democracy in an Islamic country and barbaric.
Now only a fool would fail to see that the next target is Iran,
no one knows whether they will be the United States or Israel to take the first step but one of them sooner or later it will.
Unfortunately, Iran is doing well and none of the two possible invaders can not find a convincing excuse to invade.
This continues in spite of their propaganda bombardment negative messages against Iran and its president.
Here are some examples:
will be years that Iran has the technology to build nuclear bombs, but what is waiting to produce them? Perhaps
has no intention to do so because as the same President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "The atomic bomb is the worst inhuman weapons ever devised, and should be completely eliminated." But this could also be a crap in the end only the politicians tell them.
Maybe not even going to make a pass because in the wrong and would be immediately invaded.
The U.S. and Israel are two military super powers to dispose of who knows how many nuclear warheads, Iran would be so suicidal to produce some of them and throw at them? Can you imagine that retaliation? The nation would be filled with nuclear bombs in less than a day!
may be so, but I do not believe it would be too absurd.
Remember instead the green wave? Those peaceful people protesting against the Iranian government and who have been brutally repressed by the police of the regime, here, looking a little video on you tube you realize that those people were not so peaceful and how they were treated no different Western Democrat and our methods.
But the best thing is to see how they are altered, the speeches of Ahmadinejad as when they told us that he wanted Israel to disappear from the face of the earth, in reality, his speech was a very long and complex on the dictatorships in history and, in short, told the Palestinian as well as all schemes Zionist Zionist Israel did not and I repeat, would disappear from the face of the earth one day or another. Or
Ahmadinejad has accused the U.S. government to be a part of the September 11 attacks. Even here the Iranian president's speech to the UN on September 23 of this month has not been fully heard, here is the offending piece translated by Massimo Mazzucco on luogocomune.net:
"In search for the perpetrators of the terrorist attack, there were three perspectives:
1 - That a terrorist group very powerful and sophisticated, able to drill all levels of American intelligence and security, has completed the attacks. This is the main thesis supported by the men of government Americans.
2 - That some sectors within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the negative course of the U.S. economy, tied to the Middle East, while saving the Zionist regime. The majority of Americans, as people and politicians of other countries, share this view.
3 - That the attacks were carried out by a terrorist group, but that the U.S. government has supported them and have taken advantage of the situation. Apparently this version does not have many supporters. The most important evidence relating to these attacks, some passports were found in the mountain of rubble, and a video of a certain individual, whose place of residence was unknown, but which we knew that he had participated in some major oil deals with American characters. There was also a cover-up, in the sense that it has been said that due to the explosion and fire has not found any other trace of the attackers-suicide.
remain, however, some questions to be answered.
would not have been more logical to first conduct a thorough investigation by independent groups, to identify with certainty the perpetrators of the attacks, and then to develop a rational plan to take action against them?
While giving the good version of the American government, it seems logical to wage a classic war, with widespread use of troops - that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people - to fight a terrorist group? "
Lately no mention of that Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, television and newspapers are describing as a woman who has done by the horns with her husband and now finds himself in jail and tried for adultery is stoning sentence, as if to say he steals candy and is sentenced to death.
But the truth is otherwise:
This woman has drugged her husband and let her lover to kill him, was tried for complicity in murder and sentenced to hanging with her lover, such as: stealing candy, it helps to kill the seller and is sentenced to death.
The sentence is still not final, and while in America was the sentence of death by electric chair of a mentally ill murder trial, people taking to the streets to defend Sakineh, and why the other does not? They have the same right to live despite their wrong?
If you are interested in Iran since 2002 has placed a moratorium on stoning, so much so that all the news of stoning in Iran after 2002 are from Western sources and have never been confirmed (and indeed have been repeatedly denied) by the Iranian authorities. In addition, in 2008 was presented to the Iranian Parliament a draft law that calls for eliminating even formally the mention of stoning from the penal codes. The revision of the Iranian penal system, under way since June 2009, aims, among many other things, to this objective.
Maybe it is a case that this is due to the fact that Iran sits on a sea of \u200b\u200boil and natural gas?
