On 27 February 1933, the Nazis set fire to the building of the German Parliament to give the blame for that attack the communists. Following this serious incident Hitler proclaimed a state of war on terrorism by asking the German parliament (the Reichstag) to give it broad powers to defeat the terrorists. His preposterous rhetorical leverage he needs security for the nation's claiming that such powers were essential to protect the freedom and welfare of the German people.
Following the attack organized by himself, Hitler persuaded the German legislators to give it all the emergency powers "necessary" to bring the country out of the crisis of terrorism. With such a device the fuhrer got what became known as the "Decree of the full powers", a measure that allowed Hitler to suspend "temporarily" civil liberties, that is until the "crisis" was not passed. But once you get full control over the people with a de facto dictatorship, a state of crisis that should be considered provisional provisional instead became practically permanent. And so with "the threat of terrorism ever present, Hitler was able to be renewed by the Reichstag full powers, powers he held until he lost his trail in the bunker in Berlin 12 years later.
Thomas Jefferson said: "There are people having to be afraid of their governments, but governments should be afraid of their people."
But the people must be united to create fear, I think that the powerful know it too well and this is exploiting the fear of people in the little-known peoples to feed hatred and racism, to separate the people between them, and at the same time able to maintain and strengthen its own position.
The story is chock-full of people like Hitler to gain more power have made the most of this situation.
But even today this is the case, they sell us fear, terror, terror, terror, and terror. Unabated.
For example, if you're on the airport and you see an Arab with a beard and a coat is sure to be an Islamic terrorist, if you see a Romanian street be careful who raped protresti / a, do not worry if you see a black man selling drugs, if you see a and you're a Muslim woman who passes in front of a mosque stone you may be aware that if you do not have the veil, etc.. etc. ....
But someone explain why the news programs or newspapers on any occurrence of crime, and not only specify the nationality of the person who commits a crime? What difference does it make whether the murderess example is Italian, Moroccan and Romanian? Or if it's Christian, Muslim or Jewish? It makes no sense, if a person kills no matter the origin or religion must be sent immediately to jail and stay there forever!
But in so doing they feed hatred and prejudice against completely innocent people who have nothing to do, men and women who look with suspicion without any logical reason, and it increases even more fear.
But someone also explains why every time the alarm turns out attacks around the world launched by the secret services of any country? If you think a moment to notice that these likely attacks are not mentioned any serious evidence to confirm it.
few weeks ago, the Pope was in England, it seems that someone wanted to organize against careful he and several people were arrested and then? And then they were released because they had nothing to do! FRAUD!
Well, you know what? I think our point of view is reversed: you want to see that the real terrorism of today is the direct responsibility of those who denounced it? To guard against this type of violence the bullet proof vest is not absolutely nothing.
This situation of constant fear is a veil that we do not want to see the real problems we have, as the crisis of jobs, lowering wages, layoffs, mobility, a pension that perhaps those like me will never reach, cuts costs, political who think only about their interests, extreme climate change, the collapse of the Amazon, the market for sex. We want to split at the end because they are afraid of us and what we could become if we try and calculate.
Malcolm X argued that Islam is capable of eliminating all forms of racism and discrimination, I think that even without Islam, the man would be able to do the same.
We just have to strive a bit, switching off the television and turning on the brain. We should not judge people based on their provenzienza and religion but by their actions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment